Wednesday, August 6, 2014

On the Ficticious Eagle Plot Hole

People love plot holes. Not only do they give you that fantastic feeling of being smarter than highly successful people, but they can lead to hours of fun debate amongst the right people (read: real fans). One favorite in recent years has been the Eagle plot hole in The Lord of the Rings. It's outlined in this video: 


This theory was discussed in more depth in a recent, over-simplified account that reads way too much into Gandalf's final words, "Fly, you fools!" That post inspired me to write this post and, hopefully, put this theory to bed once and for all.


First, let's remember the entire overarching plot device in the books: Sauron is incredibly powerful, and the only way to stop him is to destroy the ring. Sauron has agents and spies everywhere (even in Bree!) and a myriad of powers and fiends at his disposal, who do not want the ring to be destroyed. Secrecy is of utmost importance. Therefore, for the eagles to be the better plan, they must be at least as inconspicuous as the Fellowship.  The reason Frodo was able to destroy the ring was because he was, in the words of Galadriel, the most unlikely person for the job.

Secondly, the would-be plot theorist should be aware that Tolkien knew the danger the eagles presented to the plot. In a letter to a producer of a possible film adaption he says, "The Eagles are a dangerous 'machine'. I have used them sparingly, and that is the absolute limit of their credibility or usefulness," (Letter 210). This alone disproves nothing, but it should keep the casual observer from thinking he has chanced upon an overlooked detail that Tolkien missed.

Alright, now to my main argument, which the perceptive reader may have already guessed: the eagles did not have better means to destroy the ring at Mount Doom than the Fellowship. The books clearly present the eagles as limited in areas which would have proven fatal to the mission. Each time the Eagles are mentioned, their vulnerabilities are also made clear.


A smart theory posits the Eagles meeting the fellowship North of the Ered Lithui.
A few key examples. First, in The Hobbit, the eagles fly Bilbo and Company over the Misty Mountains, as well as swoop in to save the day at the Battle of the Five Armies. Yet, on each of these occasions, their usefulness is limited. Most important is the first encounter. After saving the Company from the goblins, Gandalf asks the eagles if they could bring them closer to their goal. The answer:

The Lord of the Eagles would not take them anywhere near where men lived. "They would shoot at us with their great bow of yew," he said, "for they would think we were after their sheep. And at other times they would be right. No! we are glad to cheat the goblins of their sport, and glad to repay our thanks to you, but we will not risk ourselves for dwarves in the southward plains." (The Hobbit, Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Fire).

Here we have the Lord of the Eagles afraid of going anywhere near where men lived because of potential harm. This isn't Mordor, this isn't Minas Tirith; heck, this isn't even Edoras. The eagles are afraid of...Lake Town. Not exactly the perfect deus ex machina.

Even when the Eagles are mustered and get involved in the Battle of the Five Armies, they are vulnerable. Sure, they help turn the tide of battle towards our heroes, but "even with the Eagles they were still outnumbered," (The Hobbit, The Return Journey). Beorn is needed to save Thorin's body.

So, even in The Hobbit, while we learn of the usefulness of the Eagles, we also learn that they have their weaknesses.

Now for the clincher, let's talk about Gandalf's escape from Isengard in Fellowship. For those who are movie-watchers only (I'm not judging...okay, a little bit), you need to know that this escape was a bit of an accident. Gandalf was not going to go to Orthanc to consult Saruman, as he seemed unwilling to help. Yet, while traveling in the East to gather information, Gandalf's fellow wizard Radagash (yep, the one with the bird nest in his hair) met him and told Gandalf that Saruman wished to meet him at Orthanc. Gandalf goes to Orthanc, but not before asking Radagash to inquire the creatures of Middle-Earth for information concerning the Ring. Luckily, Radagash was not a servant of Saruman, but only innocently (if naively) delivering a message for him. Thus, when Gandalf is in captivity, an eagle came to look for him to give Gandalf information per Radagash's request, and this allowed Gandalf to escape.

All that is to say that the Eagles' help at Orthanc was only successful through chance and luck. Gandalf, when telling the story to the Council of Elrond, makes this clear. I'll let him explain:

"That was the undoing of Saruman's plot. For Radagast knew no reason why he should not do as I asked; and he rode away towards Mirkwood where he had many friends of old. And the Eagles of the Mountain went far and wide, and they saw many things...And they sent a messenger to bring these tidings to me.
"So it was that when summer waned, there came a night of moon, and Gwaihir the Windlord, swiftest of the Great Eagles, came unlooked-for to Orthanc; and he found me standing on the pinnacle. Then I spoke to him and he bore me away, before Saruman was aware. I was far from Isengard, ere the wolves and orcs issued from the gate to pursue me." (The Fellowship of the Ring, The Council of Elrond, italics mine)

The key point to notice here is the implicit assertion that Saruman could have stopped such an escape if he was aware of, or had been looking for, the eagles. No doubt Saruman could have used wizardry, or perhaps many arrows to bring down the eagle. Again, this is Orthanc, not the dark strongholds of Mordor.

Also, the limited physical ability of the Eagles is clearly laid out in this passage when Gandalf asks how far the Eagle can bear him. The eagle answers, "Many leagues, but not to the ends of the earth. I was sent to bear tidings not burdens." Thus, even if the Council of Elrond (or Gandalf secretly) had decided to use the eagles, they would have had to travel in stages, not one fifteen minute flight to Mordor. After his escape, Gandalf is taken as far as Edoras, a distance of roughly 100 miles from Isengard; no small distance, and yet a rather small chunk of the 1700 miles Frodo and Sam walked to Mordor.

One more point comes from Return of the King. As the Eagles are ascending to save Frodo and Sam from the fires of Mt. Doom, Tolkien goes out of his way to say that even this task, one done after the defeat of the enemy, was not easy for the Eagles: "And so it was that Gwaihir saw them with his keen far-seeing eyes, as down the wild wind he came, and daring the great peril of the skies he circled in the air," (Return of the King, The Field of Cormallen). Here we have another something that might hinder the Eagles: poor weather. And we know that Saruman, at least, had the ability to manipulate the weather, and it can easily be assumed that Sauron had the same ability, probably to a greater extent (at the very least, we know he had control of Mt. Doom enough to send up ash clouds). Even aside from tampering, weather patterns and winds are perilous and can change rapidly, especially around an active volcano, making the eagle-flight to Mordor even more dangerous.
 
In conclusion, let's put all this information together. Rather than putting the Ring in the hands of the most innocent of creatures, surrounded by a group of eight capable and honorable free people and friends led by a wise Wizard, trusting on secrecy and stealth, these plot-hole theorists would put the Ring into the hands of creatures who are afraid of yew bows, and so do not even go near places where men dwell, and whose journey, despite being quicker that the Fellowship option, would also take several weeks, depending on weather patterns, and who Tolkien has clearly implied would lose a fight in which they were expected? A journey that would be done in the open sky, visible by all creatures dwelling below, including the enemy spies? Even if this journey was not discovered until the Black Gate, Sauron would have more than enough time to send a few archers with dreaded "yew bows" to Mt. Doom. Or perhaps he would just cause a ferocious storm to swallow up the eagles. Or, you know, the Nazgul! And I still haven't mentioned the corrupting power of the Ring, to which the greedy Eagles would surely be susceptible. Then think of the sheer danger for those riding on the Eagles this whole time (Bilbo himself almost falls off the Eagles in The Hobbit under peaceful conditions). Then there is the overall indifference of the Eagles towards the free peoples of MIddle-Earth. Oh, and let's consider the weight of the supplies that the Eagles would have had to place upon themselves for the journey in addition to the Fellowship members themselves. Etc., etc.

In addition, this kind of plan is the thing Sauron would expect: a plan involving might and tactical advantage, things Sauron values. The reason that the Fellowship succeeded was because Sauron could not conceive of the powerful giving the Ring to a halfling and sending him off towards Mt. Doom. Sauron could not understand this, and so he could not plan for it.

Finally, let's remember what I stated at the beginning: if the eagle plan is even a little more risky than the Fellowship-plan, it should be discarded. I hope I have clearly showed here why Gandalf and Elrond chose Frodo over Gwaihir.

Alright nerds, as you were.

Note: I'd like to give a shout-out to Sean Crist, who wrote a fantastic piece arguing that this plot hole is real. I don't agree, but I also don't want to give the impression that if you believe in the Eagle plot hole you aren't a real LOTR "fan." There is a way to argue for that opinion from an educated position.

11 comments:

  1. There's no evidence of Saruman ever controlling the weather. That scene was movie only.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From the chapter 'The Ring Goes South', Elrond speaking: "You should fear the many eyes of the servants of Sauron." he said. "I do not doubt that news of the discomfiture of the Riders has already reached him, and he will be filled with wrath. Soon now his spies on foot and wing will be abroad in the northern lands. Even of the sky above you must be aware as you go on your way."

    Later on, when they are climbing the mountain: "I wonder if this is a contrivance of the enemy," said Boromir. "They say in my land that he can govern the storms in the Mountains of Shadow that stand upon the borders of Mordor. He has strange powers and many allies."
    "His arm has grown long indeed," said Gimli, "If he can draw snow down from the North to trouble us here three hundred leagues away."
    "His arm has grown long." Said Gandalf.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Aaron. I looked this up and was going to quote those passages this morning, but you beat me to it. Of course, there is no sentence that says "Saruman and Sauron can change the weather, be careful." But it is heavily implied in the passages above.

      Delete
    2. Though, of course, it's also heavily implied that Sauron (nor Saruman) has nothing to do with this particular storm (bottom of the same page in my copy:

      "said Aragorn '[...]There are many evil and unfriendly things in the world that have little love for those that go on two legs, and yet are not in league with Sauron, but have purposes of their own. Some have been in this world longer than he.'
      " 'Caradhras was called the Cruel and had an ill name,' said Gimli, 'long years ago, when rumour of Sauron had not been heard in these lands.' "

      And a couple of pages later:

      "with that last stroke, the malice of the mountain seemed to be expended, as if Caradhras was satisfied that the invaders had been beaten off and would not dare to return. The threat of snow lifted; the clouds began to break and the light grew broader."

      I favour the theory that Caradhras was stirred to wakefulness by the presence of the Ring, making the Fellowship's troubles in part of their own making, rather than being the result of a natural hazard that any party passing that way would have faced (and any other party would have been defeated by, lacking Elf, Men and the bearer of Narya) - were Caradhras usually so deadly, not even to avoid Moria would the seasoned traveler Aragorn have steered the party that way

      Delete
  3. "The Eagles fought alongside the army of the Valar, Elves and Men during the War of Wrath at the end of the First Age, when Morgoth was overthrown. In The Silmarillion it is recounted that after the appearance of winged dragons, "all the great birds of heaven" gathered under the leadership of Thorondor to EƤrendil, and destroyed the majority of the dragons during a battle in the air.[12]"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm just saying if the eagles are going around killing the majority of dragons, I don't think a few human arrows or flying nazgul are going to stop them. #DropFrodoInMountDoom

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. And elves used to be capable of soloing Balrogs, and Dragons hell one of the greatest dragons Glaurung was killed by Turin a human, elves and men were also capable of forging weapons that never break, and competing with Sauron in contests of sorcery, hell Morgoth was once capable of warring against all the Valar and their servants combined and drawing it out to a stalemate that shattered continents and by the end of the First Age he could be defeated by a mere Maia. It seems fairly in keeping with Tolkien's work and his themes of degradation over time that the descendants of the Eagles that fought in the War of Wraith are lesser than their ancestors and not invincible dragon slaying messengers of the gods especially given all the evidence contradicting that.

      Delete
  4. Well done, I love this, thanks so much for laying it out! I was amused by the idea of them flying to Mordor, but I immediately thought about them worrying about arrows. Sauron had a hell of a lot more than a few good bowmen, and much more at stake than sheep.

    ReplyDelete